Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.30 seconds)T.P Leena vs Union Of India on 27 September, 2011
In the present case, apart from the points of
argument, the applicant has brought in the adjudication
of the CAT, Ernakulam Bench in O.A. No. 107 of 2011 (T.P.
Leena Vs. Union of India and Ors.). We have carefully
gone through this adjudication of the Tribunal. The Co
ordinate Bench of CAT had allowed the said O.A. vide its
order dated 27.09.201 Ion the ground of Clause 5 of
DOP&T's OM dated 19.05.2009 which was reproduced
therein as follows:
Smt.Manju Baidya vs Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare on 24 November, 2011
8. Since respondent authorities has not elaborated
as to how the case of Smt. Manju Dhawan (supra) is not
applicable in case of the applicant in the present OA, we
have looked at the case of Smt. Manju Dhawan
V fW<AAAAAr
7
adjudicated in O.A. No. 1070/2012 dated 08.08.2013. It is
observed that the applicant in that O.A. was asking for
Grade Pay of Rs. 4600/- w.e.f. 01.01.2006 and Grade Pay
of Rs. 5400/- w.e.f. 01.05.2007after granting 2nd AGP. The
Tribunal however, had disposed of the said O.A. by
directing the respondents to issue speaking; order within a
period of three months from fhe date of the
communication of the order in the light of the decision
•\
§ taken by Ernakulam Bench of Central Administrative
£1 /
' Tribunal in O.A. No. 107 .of 2011. Thus it is clear that the
case of the applicant hinges on the decision of CAT,
Ernakulam Bench in O.A. No. 107 of 2011 dated
27.09.2011.
1