Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 84 (0.41 seconds)
Simran Pal Singh vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 8 January, 2015 cites

Dharam Deo Yadav vs State Of U.P on 11 April, 2014

Obligation cast upon him, in view of law laid down in Dharam Deo Yadav (supra) as also provisions of Section 106 of the Evidence Act stand not discharged; (iii) conduct of the accused; (iv) disclosure statement, made by the accused; (v) which led to recovery of dead body of the deceased; (vi) and the place from where he pushed her into the gorge. In our considered view, prosecution evidence is reliable and trustworthy. It is clear, cogent, convincing and consistent. There is no missing link or doubt about the chain of events, woven by credible evidence, pointing only towards the guilt of the accused and no other hypothesis of either his innocence or possibility of involvement of a third person. Each and every incriminating circumstance stands clearly established by the prosecution. Reliable and clinching evidence is on record to such effect. It cannot be said that view other than the one, which we have discussed and formed, even by inference, would emerge on record.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 107 - K Radhakrishnan - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next