Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.17 seconds)

Bijoy Kumar Dugar vs Bidyadhar Dutta & Ors on 1 March, 2006

So far as the multiplier aspect is concerned, the deceased was a bachelor of 22 years, while his parents, the claimants are aged about 53 years and 50 years. The appellant Insurance Company has relied upon the decisions in case of Bijoy Kumar Dugar vs. Bidyadhar Dutta and others, 2006(2) PLR 329, wherein, the age of the claimants - parents was 45 & 50 years and multiplier of 12 was applied, and, in case Ram Sarup and others vs. Om Parkash and others, 2008(1) PLR 461, wherein, FAO No.3738 of 2009(O&M) [4 ] the father was aged 60 years, while the mother was aged 55 years, and in such situation, multiplier of `7' was applied. Taking stock of the decision, cited by the appellant Insurance Company, the multiplier of `10' as applied by the Tribunal in the instant case, where the father is aged 53 years, while the mother is below 50 years, cannot be said to be on the higher side. Thus, the multiplier aspect also need not be disturbed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 431 - L S Panta - Full Document

Ram Sarup And Ors. vs Om Parkash And Ors. on 28 November, 2007

So far as the multiplier aspect is concerned, the deceased was a bachelor of 22 years, while his parents, the claimants are aged about 53 years and 50 years. The appellant Insurance Company has relied upon the decisions in case of Bijoy Kumar Dugar vs. Bidyadhar Dutta and others, 2006(2) PLR 329, wherein, the age of the claimants - parents was 45 & 50 years and multiplier of 12 was applied, and, in case Ram Sarup and others vs. Om Parkash and others, 2008(1) PLR 461, wherein, FAO No.3738 of 2009(O&M) [4 ] the father was aged 60 years, while the mother was aged 55 years, and in such situation, multiplier of `7' was applied. Taking stock of the decision, cited by the appellant Insurance Company, the multiplier of `10' as applied by the Tribunal in the instant case, where the father is aged 53 years, while the mother is below 50 years, cannot be said to be on the higher side. Thus, the multiplier aspect also need not be disturbed.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1