M/S.Regent Automobile vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd on 2 September, 2008
Similarly in
M/s Regent Automobilies's case (supra), it was a case of gas
outlet under company owned company operated agreement.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.28 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited vs Prem Chand on 15 November, 2000
Corporation Limited's case (supra), the agreement was
regarding the retail outlet of the petroleum products.
Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd. And ... vs Jasbir Singh @ Jasveer Singh on 13 July, 2009
In
Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd.'s case (supra) it was a loan
agreement. The rights and liabilities persisted under such
agreements even after termination of the agreement.
Bisheshar Dayal And Anr. vs Jwala Prasad And Anr. on 1 May, 1914
Here, the lease agreement has expired by efflux of time
and the dispute between the parties is not covered by the lease
agreement. The landlord is seeking ejectment of the tenant and the
said dispute is not covered by the agreement. Therefore, the
arbitration clause in the lease agreement does not cover this
dispute and learned trial court has been fully justified in declining to
refer the dispute between the parties to the arbitration. The
decision in Ram Dayal's case (supra) cannot come to the help of
the petitioner in any way on the facts of this case. The landlord is
not seeking ejectment of the petitioner treating him as trespasser. If
the landlord has received any rent after institution of the suit, the
consequence would be considered and adjudicated upon by the
trial court.
1