U.P. Power Corporation Ltd vs Smt. Urmila Devi on 27 January, 2011
In
similar circumstances, a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in
U.P. Power Corporation Limited v. Smt. Urmila Devi3 held as follows:
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 15 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Smt. Pinki vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 12 September, 2011
21. The Rajasthan High Court in the matter of Smt. Pinki v.
State of Rajasthan and others {2012 (1) WLC (Raj.) 431} has
held that widowed daughter-in-law of the deceased Government
servant is entitled for compassionate appointment and observed
as under:
Vishnu Dev Sharma vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 23 January, 2008
In Sharma Devi v. State of U.P. through Its Additional Chief
Secretary, Food and Civil Supply and others5, it was held as follows at
Para No.7:
Smt. Pinki vs State Of Rajasthan on 15 January, 2020
6. The primary purpose of extending compassionate appointment
benefits to the dependents of deceased Government Servants is to
relieve the family from distress and destitution caused by the death of the
family's sole breadwinner. The mother-in-law of the petitioner lost her
husband and two sons before her death. The petitioner is her elder
daughter-in-law and her family consists of her sons and daughter, who
depended entirely on her mother-in-law‟s income. Aside from that income,
they have no other earning family members or properties. Her husband
passed away due to a heart attack on 16.08.2005. The learned counsel
for the petitioner has relied on a un-reported decision by the High Court of
Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in Smt. Duliya Bai Yadav v. State of
Chattisgarh1 as well as the decision of the Rajasthan High Court in Smt.
Pinki v. State of Rajasthan and others2. The relevant paragraphs of the
decisions are extracted hereunder:
Vibha Tewari vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Home ... on 12 January, 2023
16. A Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Vibha Tiwari v.
State of U.P. and 2 others4, at Para No.8 has considered the judgment
3
2011 SCC OnLine All 152
4
2024-AHC-49953-DB
13
JS, J
WP (AT) No.2139/2021
of U.P. Power Corporation Limited (3rd supra) and held as follows at
Para Nos.9 and 13:
1