Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.23 seconds)Section 25F in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 17B in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
M. Venugopal vs Divisional Manager on 31 January, 1994
5. I am fortified in my observations from the ratio of the decision in Madhya Pradesh Hasta Shilpa Vikas Nigam Ltd. v. Devendra Kumar Jain and Others (3), M. Venugopal v. Divisional Manager, LIC of India (4) and Harmohinder Singh v. Kharga Canteen (5).
Harmohinder Singh vs Kharga Canteen, Ambala Cantt on 9 July, 2001
5. I am fortified in my observations from the ratio of the decision in Madhya Pradesh Hasta Shilpa Vikas Nigam Ltd. v. Devendra Kumar Jain and Others (3), M. Venugopal v. Divisional Manager, LIC of India (4) and Harmohinder Singh v. Kharga Canteen (5).
Uptron India Limited vs Shammi Bhan & Anr on 6 February, 1998
The Apex Court also held in Uptron Ltd. v. Shammi Bhan's case (6), that the principles of natural justice are not applicable of natural justice are not applicable to such cases where the termination takes place on the expiry of the contract.
Article 311 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 14 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Secretary, Department Of Canteen ... vs Krishna Kumar Saxena on 12 October, 2000
4. Learned counsel for the respondents has placed reliance upon the matter of Secretary, Department of Canteen Management v. Krishna Kumar Saxena (1). In my view the ratio of said decision is not at all attracted to this case being distinguishable both on law and facts.