Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.17 seconds)Nazir Ahmad vs Emperor (No. 2) on 16 June, 1936
In Taylor v. Taylor1, as notably followed in Nazir
Ahmed v. King Emperor 2 and a plethora of judgments of the Supreme
Court, the most well-known being, perhaps, State of Uttar Pradesh v.
Singhara Singh3, conclude the issue, in law, in favour of the appellants. The
legal principle, fossilised over a period of time, is thus enunciated, in
Singhara Singh3:
State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Singhara Singh And Others on 16 August, 1963
In Taylor v. Taylor1, as notably followed in Nazir
Ahmed v. King Emperor 2 and a plethora of judgments of the Supreme
Court, the most well-known being, perhaps, State of Uttar Pradesh v.
Singhara Singh3, conclude the issue, in law, in favour of the appellants. The
legal principle, fossilised over a period of time, is thus enunciated, in
Singhara Singh3:
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 16 in The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 [Entire Act]
1