Lucknow Development Authority vs M.K. Gupta on 5 November, 1993
Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed in Lucknow Development Authority V. M.K.Gupta (Supra) as under:-
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.18 seconds)D.N.Badoni vs Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. on 4 November, 2011
"11. It is well settled law that a surveyor's report has significant evidentiary value, unless is proved otherwise, which the complainant has failed to do so in the case. This view was taken in the case of D.N.Badoni Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., I (2012) CPJ 272 (NC).
Sri Venkateswara Syndicate vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr on 24 August, 2009
"11. Counsel for the petitioner has also drawn our attention to the Apex Court judgement in the case Sri Venkateswara Syndicate Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., and another (2009) 8 Supreme Court Cases 507 wherein the Apex Court has held as under:-
Mrs. Sunanda Kishor Bhand & Anr. vs United India Insurance Company Limited on 15 January, 2014
In Sunanda Kishore Bhand & Anr. V. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. 1 (2014) CPJ 369 (NC), Hon'ble National Commission has observed thus:-
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Pave Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. on 21 May, 2015
Similar view was also expressed taken by Hon'ble National Commission in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pave Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. 2015 (2) CPR 577 (NC). Learned District Forum failed to take notice of this law and granted compensation to the tune of Rs.15,00,000/- lacs.
Ashahi Chemical Industries Pvt Ltd vs Gujarat Industrial Development ... on 14 June, 2016
17. The opposite party No.1-appellant is directed to fix the responsibility to the concerned official, who was responsible for delay and loss suffered by department be recovered from the concerned employee as per opinion of Hon'ble Supreme Court expressed in Oriental Aroma Chemical Industries Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation reported in (2010) 5 SCC 459 and Lucknow Development Authority V. M.K.Gupta, AIR 1994 SC 787.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Insurance Act, 1938
General Manager vs Ishwar Singh And Others on 11 November, 2008
In the oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., through its Regional Manager Vs. Ishwar Singh, 2015 (1) CPR 157 (NC), Hon'ble National Commission as observed in para Nos.11 and 17 as under:-
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs M/S. Venketshwera Distributor on 11 April, 2011
11. Learned counsel for insurance company- opposite party No.2 vehemently argued that it was never informed about change of address or business. Letters Ex.R-3 and R-4 were concocted by O.P.No.1 after the incidence of fire to escape from liability to pay any compensation. An application was filed before District forum to direct O.P. to produce any evidence about dispatch of these letters, but, no such evidence was produced. Rather it was alleged that these letters were handed over to representative of O.P.No.2 by hand, whereas no such evidence is available on the file. So, it is not liable to pay any compensation as opined by Tamil Nadu State commission in Manager, Tamilnadue Merchantile Bank ltd. vs A.X. Beski & anr. III (2003) CPJ 145. In this way there is no ambiguity that which premise was insured. When fire broke out in the different premise then covered by insurance policy, insured cannot ask for compensation as opined by Hon'ble National Commission in Shiv Confectionary House through its Sole Proprietor Vs. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance co., & Anr. 2013(3) CPC 589 and National Insurance co. Ltd. Vs. Venketshwera Distributor and another, 2011 CTJ 610 (CP) (NCDRC).
1