Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.30 seconds)Section 304 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The State Represented By The Deputy ... vs Tr. N. Seenivasagan on 1 March, 2021
5. Learned counsel for the applicant relies on the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State represented by Deputy Superintendent of Police vs. Tr. N. Seenivasagan reported in (2021) 2 JIC 10 SC and submits that without adequate cross-examination of the witnesses, it would be grave injustice to applicant. It is, thus, submitted that indulgence of this Court is required.
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Ram Babu Father-In-Law And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 21 July, 2022
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant was falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that Criminal Revision No.69 of 2020 (Vikas Juvenile Thru. His Father Sri Shiv Ram vs. State of U.P. and another) was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 14.11.2022 with direction to trial court to conclude trial within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of the said order. He further submits that after framing of charge, trial was proceeded by trial court and the case was listed on 18.07.2022, on the said date, the examination in chief of PW-1 & PW-2 was recorded and examination in chief of PW-3 & PW-4 was also recorded on 08.06.2023 but counsel could not appear for cross-examination.
1