Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.34 seconds)Krishan Chander Ramesh Chander & ... vs Sohan Lal on 24 August, 1981
However, the judgment relied upon by counsel for the
appellants decided by the Single Bench of this Court in Romesh
Chander's case (supra) cannot be made applicable to the present case.
S. S. Munna Lal vs S. S. Rajkumar And Others on 23 February, 1962
In this context, reference has been made to
judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India in R.B.S.S. Munnala
and others v. S.S. Rajkumar and others, AIR 1962 Supreme Court
1493, judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Joginder Dutt
(deceased) through his LRs v. Hans Raj (Deceased) through his LRs
and others (LPA No. 91 of 1984 along with connected LPA No. 92 of
1984, decided on 10.04.2013).
The Hindu Women's Rights To Property Act, 1937
The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Krishan Chand(D) Th. Lrs vs M/S Desh Raj Hans Raj on 16 April, 2014
In this context, reference has been made to
judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India in R.B.S.S. Munnala
and others v. S.S. Rajkumar and others, AIR 1962 Supreme Court
1493, judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Joginder Dutt
(deceased) through his LRs v. Hans Raj (Deceased) through his LRs
and others (LPA No. 91 of 1984 along with connected LPA No. 92 of
1984, decided on 10.04.2013).
Hira Lal Sharma & Ors vs Smt.Sabitri Devi & Anr on 11 February, 2010
In view of the ratio in Hira Lal's case
(supra), I find no merit in the contention of the appellants that Smt.
Runia, even if she had right of maintenance in the estate of her deceased
father-in-law in the hands of his (Albad's) legal heirs, the said right
enlarges to give her share in the estate. As Smt. Runia did not have a
share in the estate of deceased Shri Albad, there is no question of said
MOHAN LAL BIMBRA
2014.09.19 09:22
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
Chandigarh
RSA No. 3426 of 1986 (O&M) 11
right maturing into absolute ownership by invoking the provisions of
Section 14 of the 1956 Act.
1