Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.24 seconds)

People`S Union For Civilliberties ... vs The Union Of India And Another on 18 December, 1996

(6) This document also provides for Validation process for interception request. If the details are known in public domain, one can possibly forge the documents in such a way that desired checks are made leading to unlawful interception. (7) This document also contain the process of actual provisioning of targets in the various Switching network elements of Telecom Network. Exposing the same in public can be exploited by unscrupulous people for unlawful interception. (8) It is further to submit that Lawful Interception & Monitoring is governed by the provisions of Section 5(2) of Indian Telegraph Act' 1885 read with Rule 419A of Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951 amended from time to time. It is also bring to your kind notice that Rule 419A has been amended in light of the direction from the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the PUCL Vs. Union of India. These regulations are available in the public domain. A copy of these regulations has also been provided to Shri Harjodh Singh, a colleague of Shri Arjun working in the same company called SFLC.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 330 - K Singh - Full Document
1