Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.29 seconds)
Surinder Kumar vs State (Thru. Nct Of Delhi) on 22 January, 2010 cites

S.S.R.N. Sarma And Anr. vs Registrar (Administration), High ... on 16 June, 1997

Accused has been found guilty for the offence as seen above. Ld. MM has observed at page 12 of this impugned judgment that none of the prosecution witness had been cross examined by accused which led to an inference that he has admitted un-controverted and un-rebutted testimony to be correct. It is observed that PW-3 & PW-9 specifically deposed that accused appearing in this case was driving the offending vehicle at a fast speed which was rash and negligent driving and it was the cause of the accident. Ld. MM, has further found that since the vehicle of the victim namely Maruti Van was in a stationery condition when hit by the bus and the witnesses deposed that bus was driven in a very high speed, an inference of culpable rash and negligent could be drawn and support could be taken from Supreme Court judgment titled S. N. Sharma v State of AP, 1972,SC, 685. It has been further found that non examination of IO since caused no prejudice to the accused, he was liable to be convicted.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 18 - Cited by 3 - V R Reddy - Full Document

Khatri & Ors. Etc vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 10 March, 1981

Accused is un-represented in this appeal also. Section 304 CrPC provides for a legal aid to an accused who was not represented by a pleader and further where it appears to the court that accused had no sufficient means to engage a pleader. This provision is primarily applicable in a trial pending before Sessions court. Further clause 3 of this provision provides that State Government by notification might direct that the provisions of this section were applied to other cases of trial before other court. Importance of a fair and reasonable defence to the accused while facing a charge on a criminal case has been examined by the Supreme Court in a case Khatri v State of Bihar, AIR, 1981, SC, 928, where it has been held that trial is vitiated when the accused persons are not about free legal assistance and they remained un-defence Page No. 7 during trial.
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 148 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document
1   2 Next