Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.20 seconds)Section 13 in The Saurashtra University Act, 1965 [Entire Act]
Maganlal Shivlal vs Memon Daudbhai Mithabhai on 12 December, 1968
6. Mr. Parghi, learned Advocate appearing for the appellant-defendant, submitted that such demolition and reconstruction would not be included within the meaning of the word "renovation". This question has been concluded by the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in Maganlal Shivlal v. Memon Daudbhai Mithabhai, (1969) 10 Guj LR 336. It has been observed therein:
H.K. Swaranavar Nashar And Ors. vs State Of Mysore And Anr. on 22 November, 1961
14. Mr. Parghi invited my attention to the decision of the Mysore High Court in H.K. Swaranavar Nashar v. State of Mysore, AIR 1963 Mys 49. The relevant observations made at page 58, are:
Tata Chemicals Ltd. And Ors. vs Kailash C. Adhvaryu on 23 November, 1963
In Tata Chemicals Ltd. v. Kailash, AIR 1964 Guj 265, Bhagwati, J., (as he then was), has observed:
1