Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.18 seconds)
Ashok Uttam Suryawanshi vs Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny ... on 27 March, 2026 cites

Ravindra Pralhadrao Khare vs State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... on 26 July, 2019

In this regard, a useful reference can be made to the decision of the Division Bench in the matter of Ravindra Pralhadrao Khare Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others, in Writ Petition No.11241/2012. The coordinate bench had occasion to deal with the issue that if only Thakur is mentioned as caste in pre-constitutional document, then what would be the consequences. We reproduce paragraph nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6:
Bombay High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - B Dangre - Full Document

Anand vs Committee For S.&V. Of Tribe Claims &Ors on 8 November, 2011

"10. The present case is squarely covered by the principles laid down by the coordinate bench referring to the decision of Supreme Court in the matter of Anand Vs. Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims and Others (supra). Even reliance on the affinity test cannot be a sole criteria to reject the claim. The finding recorded by the Committee for discarding the pre- constitutional record is perverse which is appearing on page no.48 of the paper-book."
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 341 - D K Jain - Full Document

Lahu Dashrath Thakur vs Schedules Tribe Certificate Scrutiny ... on 30 November, 2021

15. We however, find that there was no occasion for either the petitioner or his forefathers to fraudulently record their caste as 'Thakur' so as to claim themselves of belonging to Scheduled Tribe 'Thakur'. In the light of documents of pre-independence era, we are of the considered view that the petitioner and his forefathers have to be treated as Scheduled Tribe 'Thakur' more so in the absence of any material to show that they belong to the upper caste 'Thakur'. We have already held that one entry showing the caste of petitioner's uncle as 'Brahmbhat', cannot discard the previous entries showing the caste of petitioner's forefathers as 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe. We are therefore, of the considered view that the case of petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Lahu Dashrath Thakur (supra).
Bombay High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S G Mehare - Full Document
1