Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 338 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 279 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Karnataka vs Satish on 13 March, 1996
Learned counsel for the appellant had urged that the
accident had occurred due to rash and negligent driving by the three
wheeler driver as it was over-loaded with fifteen passengers, as
against the capacity of six passengers. Referring to site plan
Ex.PW22/B, it was urged that it was the three wheeler which had
come on the wrong side which resulted in the accident. He had
further submitted that none of the witnesses had deposed that the
appellant was driving the bus rashly and negligently and they only
stated that the bus was driven at a high speed and that would not
attract the provisions of Section 304-A IPC and he cannot be said to
be negligent. To support his contention, he had referred to State of
Karnataka Vs. Satish, 1999 ACJ 1378 (SC) and Pardeep Kumar
JITEN SHARMA
Vs. State of Haryana, 2000 Crl. L.J. 3394.
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1