Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 39 (0.25 seconds)
Deepali Chopraa @ Deepali Ahuja vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of ... on 9 October, 2023
cites
The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
Section 26 in The Maintenance And Welfare Of Parents And Senior Citizens Act, 2007 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Maintenance And Welfare Of Parents And Senior Citizens Act, 2007 [Entire Act]
Section 22 in The Maintenance And Welfare Of Parents And Senior Citizens Act, 2007 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Maintenance And Welfare Of Parents And Senior Citizens Act, 2007 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Maintenance And Welfare Of Parents And Senior Citizens Act, 2007 [Entire Act]
Satish Chander Ahuja vs Sneha Ahuja on 15 October, 2020
14. It was further submitted that the petitioner does not have an unconditional right of residence in the shared household. Respondent No. 7, who is the son of respondent No. 6, has already taken a house on rent to accommodate the petitioner. She had given her consent to move into the said house but has subsequently declined to shift. Respondent no. 7 has further offered to take any other house on rent which the petitioner desires, but she is insistent on residing in the disputed premises where she does not have any right of residence. He further placed reliance on the judgement of the Supreme Court in the case of Satish Chandra Ahuja Vs. Sneha Ahuja, 2021 (1) SCC 414 to buttress his submission that right of residence of the petitioner in the disputed house, as per section 17 of the act of 2005 is not a indefeasible right, and under the circumstances as occurring in the present case, the respondent No. 6 could legally and validly enforce an order for eviction as per the provisions of act of 2007.
S. Vanitha vs The Deputy Commissioner on 15 December, 2020
It is when the Maintenance Tribunal duly considers the rights of the daughter-in-law under the Act, 2005, the said order can be called a composite order and as held by the Apex Court in the case of S. Vineetha (supra) the said composite order would have to be placed before a competent Court dealing with Section 25 of the Act, 2005.