Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.46 seconds)Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 54 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors vs Shri Dharam Das on 25 August, 1995
The learned counsel would contend that in any view of the matter the
decision of this Court in Dharam Das, (supra) could not have been relied
upon as the principles of res judicata would be attracted to the fact of
the present case and furthermore in view of the fact that the said order
has been acted upon.
Pandit Ishwardas vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors. on 9 January, 1979
"In Ishwardas v. the State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors., AIR (1979) SC 551,
this Court held:
Gulabchand Chhotalal Parikh vs State Of Bombay (Now Gujarat) on 14 December, 1964
In Gulabchand Chhotalal Parikh v. State of Gujarat, AIR (1965) SC 1153 the
Constitution Bench held that the principle of res judicata is also
applicable to subsequent suits where the same issues between the same
parties had been decided in an earlier proceeding under Article 226 of the
Constitution.
Himachal Pradesh Road Transport ... vs Balwant Singh on 17 September, 1992
It is trite that the principle of res judicata is also applicable to the
writ proceedings. [See Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation v.
Balwant Singh, [1993] Supp 1 SCC 552].
Bhanu Kumar Jain vs Archana Kumar & Anr on 17 December, 2004
In Bhanu Kumar Jain v. Archana Kumar and Anr., [2005] 1 SCC 787, it was
held:
Satyadhyan Ghosal And Others vs Sm. Deorajin Debi And Another on 20 April, 1960
"It is now well-settled that principles of res judicata applies in
different stages of the same proceedings. [See Satyadhyan Ghosal and Ors.
v. Smt. Deorajin Debi and Anr., AIR (1960) SC 941 and Prahlad Singh v. Col.
Sukhdev Singh, [1987] 1 SCC 727].
Madan Mohan Pathak And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 21 February, 1978
In Madan Mohan Pathak and Anr v. Union of India and Ors., [1978] 2 SCC 50 :