Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.27 seconds)Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 142 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Hardeep Singh vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 10 January, 2014
18. What is the stage at which power under section 319
of Cr.P.C. can be exercised came up for consideration of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in HARDEEP SINGH case, referred supra,
and the Hon'ble Apex Court in para 117 of the judgment has
summed up the consequences as under:-
Section 19 in The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 [Entire Act]
Section 193 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 207 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 208 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Aneeta Hada vs M/S Godfather Travels & Tours Pvt.Ltd on 8 May, 2008
9. The contention of learned counsel for respondent is
that, "Firm" is not a legal entity qua partner. In view of section
18 of the Partnership Firm Act, 1932, every partner is the agent
of the firm for the purposes of the business of the firm and by
virtue of section 19 of the Partnership Act, an act of a partner
does not, in the usual course of business, binds the firm. A
partnership firm is not a legal entity. The position of a partner
qua a firm is in not in the nature of Master and servant. Hence,
the law laid down in the case of Aneeta Hada's case, supra,
which was rendered in the context of a Company which is a
juristic person, cannot be made applicable in the case of
partnership firm which is not a separate juristic person.