Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.27 seconds)Section 7 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Court Fees in Delhi
Section 14 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Smt. Rattan Rani Fotedar (Through Her ... vs Union Of India & Ors on 24 January, 2023
"a. W.P.(C) 476/2022 - Rattan Rani Fotedar Vs. UOI &
Ors.
Smt. Rattan Rani Fotedar vs Dr. Jitender Fotedar & Anr on 15 March, 2022
c. C.S 3137/2022 - Ratan Rani v. Dr. Jitender (Suit for
possession of master bedroom under Section 6 of SPA in
District Court of Gurugram).
Section 34 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Registration Act, 1908
Anita Anand vs Gargi Kapur & Ors on 19 September, 2018
26. Surhid Singh (supra) was relied upon by this Court's decision in Anita
Anand (supra), where it was noted that the plaintiff in that case was not in
possession of the suit property and, therefore, ad valorem Court Fees had to be
paid.
Sushma Tehlan Dalal vs Shivraj Singh Tehlan & Ors on 4 March, 2011
30. Reference in this regard may be made to the decision of this Court in
Shushma Tehlan Dalal v. Shivraj Singh Tehlan, 2011 SCC OnLine Del 1156,
the following paragraphs being instructive: