Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.24 seconds)
Gurdarshan Singh S/O. Dalip Singh And ... vs Bishan Singh S/O. Uttam Singh on 24 November, 1961
cites
Section 65 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 108 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 32 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Section 2 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Displaced Persons (Debts Adjustment) Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
S. Milkha Singh And Ors. vs N.K. Gopala Krishna Mudaliar And Ors. on 4 May, 1956
After an exhaustive discussion of the connotation of the word "debt" as also the scheme of the Act, Capoor, J., with whom Pandit, J., agreed, came to the conclusion that the term "debt" as defined in Sub-section (6) of Section 2 must be restricted in the sense laid down by Chagla, C. J. in Iron and Hardware, (India) Co. v. Firm Shamlal and Bros., AIR 1954 Bom 423 and followed by two Division Benches of this Court in Milkha Singh v. Gopala Krishna Mudaliar, AIR 1956 Punj 174 and Jattu Lal Darbar Singh v. Imperial Bank of India, F. A. F. O. No. 87 of 1953, D/- 20-11-1958 (Punj). The claim of compensation by way of damages on account of the alleged wrongful detention of the goods by the bank was held not to fall within the word "debt".
Inder Pershad Singh vs Campbell on 23 March, 1881
Another Calcutta decision in Inder Pershad Singh v. Campbell, ILR 7 Cal 474, is to the effect that the doctrine of frustration applies to a lease.