Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.25 seconds)
S.T. Ganapathy Mudaliar And Anr. vs S.G. Pandurangan And Ors. on 31 August, 1998 cites

V.M. Rao And Ors. vs Rajeswari Ramakrishnan And Ors. on 2 August, 1985

Shri Harikrishnan replying to the arguments of learned counsel for the respondents, submitted that it is wrong on the part of the respondents to claim that there was an oral family arrangement. He submitted that the alleged signature of the first petitioner in the purported family settlement is a forgery and he relied on the opinion given by a handwriting expert which is annexed to the petition. He further submitted that the company cannot take cognizance of any family settlement controlling the affairs of the company unless and otherwise the company itself had been a party to the same and such terms of family settlement are incorporated either in the articles of association or memorandum failing which the governance of a company should be governed by the provisions of the articles of association/memorandum. For this proposition he relied on V. M. Rao v. Rajeshwari Ramakrishnan [1986] 1 Comp LJ 1 ; [1987] 61 Comp Cas 20 (Mad).
Madras High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 43 - V Ramaswami - Full Document
1   2 Next