Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)Mrs. Umraodevi Sawatraj Golecha, ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Shri ... on 23 April, 2003
14. In response to the above notice, the petitioner filed it's reply
contending that the students were admitted to protect their academic
interest. The blame was sought to be thrown at the door of the
University for not granting affiliation. According to the reply, in some
cases, in favour of some of the institutions affiliation is granted whereas
in some cases it was denied without there being any valid reason. The
submission made is absolutely misplaced. In our considered view, the
petitioner could not have admitted students without there being any
affiliation. The loss of one academic year of the students cannot be
brushed aside. The relief of monetary compensation, as exemplary
damages, in proceedings under Article 226 by the High Courts can
always be granted. Similar relief was granted by this court in favour of
the students in more or less similar facts in the case of S.M.B.S.P.Mandal
..vs.. State of Maharashtra, 2005(5) Bom.C.R.395.
1