Vikramjit Singh @ Vicky vs State Of Punjab on 24 November, 2006
No. M-16167 of 2017 on 1.11.2017 in case titled as Vikramjit
Singh @ Vicky Vs. State of Punjab .
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.17 seconds)Section 22 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 439 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sandeep Singh @ Sonu And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 6 April, 2018
Admittedly, the recovery from the petitioner is 60 gms of
intoxicating powder (Diphenoxylate Hydrochloride) which is marginally
more than the commercial quantity. By considering that the petitioner is in
custody for about seven months, orders passed by this Court in Mandeep
Singh's case (supra), Sumit Gori's case (supra) and Vikramjit Singh's
case (supra) and also the fact that there is no other case pending against the
petitioner and that all the witnesses are official witnesses, the present
petition is allowed. Petitioner-Satnam Singh @ Sattu is directed to be
released on regular bail subject to his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the
satisfaction of trial Court.
Sumit Gori vs State Of Punjab on 28 September, 2017
Admittedly, the recovery from the petitioner is 60 gms of
intoxicating powder (Diphenoxylate Hydrochloride) which is marginally
more than the commercial quantity. By considering that the petitioner is in
custody for about seven months, orders passed by this Court in Mandeep
Singh's case (supra), Sumit Gori's case (supra) and Vikramjit Singh's
case (supra) and also the fact that there is no other case pending against the
petitioner and that all the witnesses are official witnesses, the present
petition is allowed. Petitioner-Satnam Singh @ Sattu is directed to be
released on regular bail subject to his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the
satisfaction of trial Court.
1