Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.24 seconds)

National Hydroelectric Power ... vs Commr.Of Income Tax on 5 January, 2010

Since no addition can be raised except this according to special provision mentioned in the provision u/s 115JB of the Act, therefore, the finding of the CIT(A) is not justifiable, hence, by relying upon the law mentioned above i.e., Apollo Tyres Ltd. Vs. CIT (2002) ITR 273 (SC) and National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. CIT (2010) 187 Taxman 193 (SC), we set aside the finding of the CIT(A) on this issue and allowed the claim of the assessee."
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 27 - S H Kapadia - Full Document

Apollo Tyres Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kochi on 2 May, 2002

Since no addition can be raised except this according to special provision mentioned in the provision u/s 115JB of the Act, therefore, the finding of the CIT(A) is not justifiable, hence, by relying upon the law mentioned above i.e., Apollo Tyres Ltd. Vs. CIT (2002) ITR 273 (SC) and National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. CIT (2010) 187 Taxman 193 (SC), we set aside the finding of the CIT(A) on this issue and allowed the claim of the assessee."
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 649 - Full Document

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S Foresee Information Systems(P)Ltd on 12 February, 2014

15. The CIT(A) has decided the matter of controversy on the basis of his earlier adjudication before the CIT(A). Moreover, this issue is also decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Bhari Information Technology Systems (P) Ltd. (2012) 340 ITR 593 (SC) in which it is specifically held that the reduction claim u/s 80HHC had to be worked out on the basis of adjusted book profit u/s 115JB of the Act and not on the basis of profits computed under regular provisions of law applicable to computation of profits and gains business. Taking into account of all the facts and circumstances, we are of the view that the finding of the CIT(A) is quite justifiable which is not liable to be interfered with at this appellate stage. Accordingly, this issue is decided in favour of the assessee against the revenue.
Karnataka High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 8 - Full Document
1