Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.31 seconds)

State Of Gujarat vs Kishanbhai on 7 January, 2014

38. In view of my observations regarding the conduct of the IO, SHO and ACP concerned, who were responsible for conducting as well as supervision of investigation, the conduct of the above said officers are liable to be brought into the notice of the Commissioner of Police, Delhi. Let the copy of the judgment be sent to the Learned Commissioner of Police, Delhi, to look into the matter and to consider the action as directed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Kishanbhai case (supra) and by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Pawan @ Diggi (supra) and Baljeet Singh case (Supra), in time bound manner and also to communicate to this court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 87 - J S Khehar - Full Document

Pawan @ Diggi vs State on 24 January, 2014

38. In view of my observations regarding the conduct of the IO, SHO and ACP concerned, who were responsible for conducting as well as supervision of investigation, the conduct of the above said officers are liable to be brought into the notice of the Commissioner of Police, Delhi. Let the copy of the judgment be sent to the Learned Commissioner of Police, Delhi, to look into the matter and to consider the action as directed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Kishanbhai case (supra) and by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Pawan @ Diggi (supra) and Baljeet Singh case (Supra), in time bound manner and also to communicate to this court.
Delhi High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 2 - K Gambhir - Full Document
1   2 Next