Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.62 seconds)
Sunderlal Goswami And Anr. vs Jogeshwar Prasad Singh And Ors. on 20 August, 1974 cites

Shama Charan Nandi vs Abhiram Goswami on 17 February, 1906

and the usufructs were apparently in the personal enjoyment of the grantee and the grantor might have contemplated that the profits of the property, after satisfying the personal wants of the grantee, would be devoted to the service of the God whom the grantee attended, such an expectation or anticipation may explain the use of the words 'debuttar' 'Sheoprit' etc., but does not suffice to constitute a valid dedication to the God (of Shama Charan Nundy v. Abhiram Goswami, (1906) 3 Cal LJ 306)).
Calcutta High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

Somar Puri vs Shyam Narain Gir And Ors. on 4 May, 1954

Narayan, J. who was a party to the Bench decision in Somar Puri's case, had also decided the earlier case of Khub Narain Missir, and, while recording a separate corroborative judgment, the learned Judge held that it was on the special facts of the case of Somar Puri and on the basis of the evidence adduced in the case, apart from the use of the words 'debutter' 'Chivottar', that it was being held that there was a complete dedication.
Patna High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Khub Narain Missir And Ors. vs Ramchandra Narain Dass on 25 January, 1950

is a decision against him on the question of law, for, the decision of this Court in that first appeal was based upon an appraisal of the grant and other pieces of evidence, both documentary and oral, which had induced the Bench of this Court to record a finding agreeing with the trial Court that there was evidence of complete dedication; and, even while other pieces of evidence aliunde were being considered in Somar Puri's case, Das, J. (as he then was), referring with approval to the decision of this Court in Khub Narain's case (AIR 1951 Pat 340). held, at page 590. that the words 'Vishnu-prit' and 'Sheoprit' etymologically meant 'love of Vishnu' or 'love of Shiva' and they did not necessarily lead to the inference that the donor intended that the properties would be gifts not to the Mahanth but that the properties would be used by the public and would be treated as a public trust. It was further held that "the construction of a document cannot depend on one isolated word taken from its context".
Patna High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1