Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.43 seconds)
Sk. Ekbal @ Ekbal Sk vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 3 April, 2024 cites

Sita Ram & Ors vs Moti Lal Nehru Farmers Training ... on 5 March, 2008

The Appellate Authority, according to the respondent no.4 (employer), therefor has come to a right conclusion disallowing the claim for gratuity between 1968 and 1973. The respondent no.4 also says that the ratio laid down in Sita Ram (supra) is binding in this case though the petitioner says that the said judgment having been rendered in the context of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short, I. D. Act) is not applicable in a case under 1972 Act. The respondent no.4 also submits that the Appellate Authority has rightly rejected the petitioner's claim for gratuity between 7th July, 2006 and 15th July, 2012, although on a different ground from that adopted by the Controlling Authority. It is correct, according to the respondent no.4, that the petitioner could not produce any substantive document for the period between 7th July, 2006 and 15th July, 2012. That apart and in any event, on having attained the age of superannuation on 7th July, 2006 is not entitled to receive gratuity in view of the provisions of the standing orders applicable to jute industry including the respondent no.4.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 413 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Lalappa Lingappa & Ors vs Laxmi Vishnu Textile Mills Ltd., ... on 11 February, 1981

The petitioner says that the appellate authority erred in law by considering Lalappa Lingappa (supra) as by virtue of the amendment brought into the 1972 Act on 11th February, 1981 by introducing Section 2A the requirement of 240 days in a calendar year is no more in the statute. The judgement of Lalappa Lingappa was also delivered on 11th February, 1981.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 145 - A P Sen - Full Document

Hetram Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh 102 Sa/321/2003 ... on 5 December, 2018

The petitioner then relies upon the judgement reported in 2018 (157) FLR 477 - 2018 (5) SCC 430 (Netram Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Anr. By relying upon the said judgement the writ petitioner says that once the writ petitioner was made permanent on 25th June, 1978, irrespective of his nature of work prior to such date he becomes entitled to claim and receive gratuity from his initial entry at his employers' place i.e. 18th October, 1968. The writ petitioner also says that the appellate authority had erred in law by disallowing his claim for gratuity between 7th July, 2006 and 15th July, 2012. The writ petitioner says that there is no dispute 7 that he did not work continuously between 7th July, 2006 and 15th July, 2012. The only objection by the employer is that he is not entitled to receive gratuity after he has attained the age of superannuation as per standing orders applicable to the respondent no.4.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 21 - P K Mishra - Full Document
1