Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.24 seconds)Article 17 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Court Fees in Delhi
Section 9 in The Suits Valuation Act, 1887 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Court-fees Act, 1870 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Suits Valuation Act, 1887 [Entire Act]
Jagdish Pershad And Ors. vs Joti Pershad And Ors. on 16 December, 1974
In Jagdish Pershad & ors vs Jyoti
Pershad & ors, ILR 1975 Delhi 841, this court
held that when a joint owner seeks partition of
the property, they merely seek a change in the
mode of enjoyment of the said property, where
a mere denial of right or title by the other co
sharers does not amount to an ouster of the
plaintiff.
The Punjab Courts Act, 1918
Section 3 in The Suits Valuation Act, 1887 [Entire Act]
P. Lakshmi Reddy vs L. Lakshmi Reddy on 5 December, 1956
In B.R. Patil (supra), the Supreme Court has placed reliance on,
inter alia, the earlier judgment in P. Lakshmi Reddy v. L. Lakshmi
Reddy, AIR 1957 SC 314, wherein it had been held that the possession
of one co-heir is considered as possession of all the co-heirs.
However, the said judgment cannot come to the aid of the plaintiffs in
the present case. The plaintiffs, as noted hereinabove, have themselves
admitted to have been ousted from the possession of the Suit Property
by the defendant. Therefore, the plaintiffs shall pay the Court Fees in
accordance with Section 7(vi)(b) of the Act.