Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.29 seconds)Article 141 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
M/S Patil Automation Private Limited vs Rakheja Engineers Private Limited on 17 August, 2022
Hence, I cannot come to the conclusion that the plaintiff is not
entitled to the benefits of paragraph 113.1 of the Patil Automation case.
The Amalgamated Coalfields Ltd. And ... vs The Janapada Sabha, Chhindwara (And ... on 10 February, 1961
25. The Constitution Bench in Amalgamated Coal Fields case was
dealing with the issue whether doctrine of constructive res judicata applies or
not to the case before it. While discussing that issue, the Supreme Court held
that the Supreme Court can declare, by implication, the position of law which
would be binding in terms of Article 141 of the Constitution.
Deepak Raheja vs Ganga Taro Vazirani on 1 October, 2021
Even in that case, he points out that as the suit had been presented prior
to the law declared in Deepak Raheja's case, the suit is entitled to the benefit
under paragraph 113.1 of the Patil Automation case.
Sathyam Wood Industries vs Adoniss (P) Ltd on 10 June, 2019
The issue whether Section 12A is mandatory or
directory not having been continuously determined in Sathyam Wood
Industries case, at best, it is a decision rendered sub silentio. Hence, it cannot
be elevated to the status of declaration of law.
Yamini Manohar vs T K D Keerthi on 13 October, 2023
In Yamini Manohar's case too,
the Supreme Court held, in case of an urgent interim relief is sought for, then
the requirement of pre litigation mediation need not be followed. It further
observed if the urgent relief is one projected to avoid pre-litigation mediation,
14/24
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.(PD).No.4609 of 2024
then the Court should not permit a party to get around the provision.