Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.20 seconds)The Consumer Protection Act, 1986
M/S Emaar Mgf Land Limited vs Aftab Singh on 10 December, 2018
10. The Hon'ble Apex Court has put to rest the controversy relating to
the existence of arbitration clauses in the disputes as is evident
from the relevant paragraph of Emaar MGF Land Limited
(supra). In the present case also, the respondent opted for the
special remedies provided under the Consumer Protection Act,
1986, which is in addition to and not in derogation of the
provisions of any other law for the time being in force. Hence, this
commission is authorised to adjudicate the case and the existence
of Section 60 of Delhi-Co-operative Act does not affect the
jurisdiction of District commission.
Ghaziabad Development Authority vs Balbir Singh on 17 March, 2004
In this regard, the observation of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court made in Ghaziabad Development Authority v.
Balbir Singh (2004) 5 SCC 65 are quote worthy and
are as under:
Section 60 in The Delhi Co-Operative Societies Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Consumer Protection Act, 2019
Mehnga Singh Khera & Anr. vs M/S. Unitech Ltd. on 18 December, 2019
7. Analysis of Section 24A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
leads us to the conclusion that the District Commission is
empowered to admit a complaint if it is filed within a period of 2
DISMISSED PAGE 5 OF 8
FA - 750/2010 AZAD HIND CGHS LTD. VS REENA MITTAL DOD: 13.07.2022
years from the date on which cause of action has arisen. We further
deem it appropriate to refer to the case of Mehnga Singh Khera
and Ors. Vs. Unitech Ltd. reported in I (2020) CPJ 93 (NC),
wherein the Hon'ble National Commission has held as under:
K.E.B. Employees Co-Operative Society ... vs V. Munivenkatappa on 18 January, 2006
In the similar and identical
case of the Hon'ble National Consumer' Disputes
Redressal Commission in KEB Employees Co-operative
Society, Limited Vs. V. Munivenkatappa III(2006) CPJ
259 (NC) has directed the OP i.e. co-operative society
to pay the interest@ 18% p.a.
The complainant claims Rs.50,000/- as compensation
and Rs.10,000/- as litigation charges. We have already
recorded a finding that the complainant was deprived of
use of this money more than Rs.80,000/- for a period of
15 days, therefore, she has mental agony, harassment
and sheer suffering.
1