Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.26 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Anand vs Committee For S.&V. Of Tribe Claims &Ors on 8 November, 2011
9. Precisely for this reason, though in the normal course,
affinity test is not to be resorted to, not being a litmus test, as laid down
in the matter of Anand V. Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of
Tribe Claims and others; (2012) 1 SCC 113, but it has its own
significance in an appropriate case, as observed in paragraph no. 25 of
Maharashtra Adiwasi Thakur Jamat Swarakshan Samiti Vs. State
5 WP / 7545 / 2024
of Maharashtra and others; 2023 SCC Online SC 326, which reads
as under:
Mah.Adiwasi Thakur Jamat Swarakshan ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 24 March, 2023
9. Precisely for this reason, though in the normal course,
affinity test is not to be resorted to, not being a litmus test, as laid down
in the matter of Anand V. Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of
Tribe Claims and others; (2012) 1 SCC 113, but it has its own
significance in an appropriate case, as observed in paragraph no. 25 of
Maharashtra Adiwasi Thakur Jamat Swarakshan Samiti Vs. State
5 WP / 7545 / 2024
of Maharashtra and others; 2023 SCC Online SC 326, which reads
as under:
Gayatrilaxmi Bapurao Nagpure vs State Of Maharashtra &. Others on 15 March, 1996
In this behalf reference can be made to the ruling of
the Supreme Court reported in 1996(2) Mh.L.J. (SC) 402 =
(1996) 3 SCC 685 in the matter of Gayatrilaxmi Baburao
Nagpure v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. While dealing with
similar circumstances, after referring to the principles laid down
in Ku. Madhuri Patil v. Additional Commissioner and Ors., AIR
1995 SC 94. Their Lordships have observed in para No. 17 of
the report that,
Radhakishan Yashavantaa Kakulte vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another on 4 March, 2021
13. Paragraph no. 13 from Vaijnath Zunjkar and paragraph
no. 11 from Yogesh Kakulte (supra) need to be looked into, which
read as under:
Janardhan S/O. Laxmanrao Mhaske And ... vs The Caste Scrutiny Committee, Amrawati ... on 5 December, 2022
12. Incidentally, in both the matters viz. Vaijnath Zunjkar and
Yogesh Kakulte (supra), division bench of this Court had similarly
7 WP / 7545 / 2024
observed that the committee could not have insisted for pre-
constitutional record and set aside its orders refusing to validate the
tribe claims, however, precisely noting that in both those matters, the
claimants had been successful in the affinity test.
1