Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.41 seconds)Section 5 in The Public Premises (Eviction Of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
Section 5B in The Public Premises (Eviction Of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
Section 5C in The Public Premises (Eviction Of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Public Premises (Eviction Of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Public Premises (Eviction Of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
Balakrishnan vs Krishna Moorthy And Ors. on 16 June, 1981
Sri P.V. Sanjay Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited also placed reliance on the judgment of Balakrishnan's case and submits that when the Chief Judge, who is Appellate Authority under Section 9 of the Act has exercised discretion, this Court should not interfere with the same under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The Public Premises (Eviction Of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971
B. Shankara Rao Badami & Ors vs State Of Mysore & Anr on 4 December, 1968
In B. Shankara Rao v. State of Mysore, the maxim was explained and followed by the Supreme Court.
Union Of India And Another vs Tulsiram Patel And Others on 11 July, 1985
It was pointed out that this well known maxim is principle of logic and common sense and not merely a technical rule of construction Further in Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel, the Supreme Court applied the maxim while interpreting the proviso to Article 311(2) of the Constitution of India.