Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.36 seconds)
Sk. Mehboob S/O Sk. Mastan (In Jail) vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through ... on 14 November, 2017
cites
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The State Of Punjab vs Gian Kaur And Anr on 5 March, 1998
7. The marriage between the deceased Shama Parvin and the
accused axiomatically was solemnised more than seven years prior to
the death since the eldest of the four daughters born from the wedlock
was aged 7 to 8 years as on 05-12-2004. The dying declaration Exhibit
57 is recorded by P.W.2 Arvind Bhagat between 1.05 a.m. and 1.15
a.m. on 03-12-2004. Ms. Haidari, learned Counsel would invite my
attention to the fact that P.W.2 Arvind Bhagat received the requisition
to record the dying declaration at 12-55 hours, he reached the hospital
at 1.00 hours, secured the fitness certificate of the medical practitioner
at 1.05 hours and commenced and completed the recording at 1.15
hours. The effort is to demonstrate that the time line is sufficient to
cloud the dying declaration with suspicion. Ms. F.N. Haidari, learned
Counsel then invites my attention to the fact that the dying declaration
purports to bear the left hand thumb impression of the deceased. The
learned Counsel submits that concededly both the thumbs of the
deceased suffered 100% burns since the post-mortem Exhibit 127
records that both right upper limb and left upper limb suffered 9%
burn injuries with no spared area. 9% burn injuries on the right upper
::: Uploaded on - 14/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 16/11/2017 01:54:19 :::
5 apeal605.14
limb or left upper limb correspond to 100% burns, according to Modi's
medical jurisprudence, is the submission. Ms. F.N. Haidari, learned
Counsel invites my attention to the following observations of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab v. Gian Kaur
and another reported in AIR 1998 SC 2809 :
Section 155 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Abdul Riyaz Abdul Bashir vs State Of Maharashtra on 6 March, 2012
1 apeal605.14
Ms. F.N. Haidari, learned Counsel invites my attention to
the following observations of the Division Bench of this Court in Abdul
Riyz Abdul Bashir vs. State of Maharashtra reported in 2012 ALL
MR (Cri) 2188.
1