Class-I heirs of deceased
Ankush. Plaintiff no. 1, being the father of deceased Ankush,
is a Class-II heir. Hence, plaintiff no.1 would ... denied by respondent no. 1. Plaintiff nos. 2 to 4, the Class-I
heirs of deceased Ankush, have relinquished their right to
seek specific performance
2 are his daughters and Defendant no.3 is mother of
Pravin. Plaintiffs as well as Defendant Nos.1 to 3 are Class-I heirs ... parties and
that the Petitioners and Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are Class-I heirs of deceased
Pravin Maloo and the parties are Hindu
2 are his daughters and Defendant no.3 is mother of
Pravin. Plaintiffs as well as Defendant Nos.1 to 3 are Class-I heirs ... parties and
that the Petitioners and Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are Class-I heirs of deceased
Pravin Maloo and the parties are Hindu
probate,
it is undisputed that Petitioners Nos. 2 and 3 are the Class II legal
heirs of Dr. Feroze Duggan, under the law of intestate ... even a person who acquires an interest
1
(2008) 1 SCC 267
2
AIR 1933 Bom 370 (at para 7)
25/47
::: Uploaded
probate,
it is undisputed that Petitioners Nos. 2 and 3 are the Class II legal
heirs of Dr. Feroze Duggan, under the law of intestate ... even a person who acquires an interest
1
(2008) 1 SCC 267
2
AIR 1933 Bom 370 (at para 7)
25/47
::: Uploaded
probate,
it is undisputed that Petitioners Nos. 2 and 3 are the Class II legal
heirs of Dr. Feroze Duggan, under the law of intestate ... even a person who acquires an interest
1
(2008) 1 SCC 267
2
AIR 1933 Bom 370 (at para 7)
25/47
::: Uploaded
probate,
it is undisputed that Petitioners Nos. 2 and 3 are the Class II legal
heirs of Dr. Feroze Duggan, under the law of intestate ... even a person who acquires an interest
1
(2008) 1 SCC 267
2
AIR 1933 Bom 370 (at para 7)
25/47
::: Uploaded
widow, sons and daughter
succeeded to the said Gomantak Flat as Class I heirs. Neither the deceased,
nor the Plaintiffs had any right, title ... 2 would not have succeeded
to the estate of the deceased on the day the succession opened, as they
were not Class I heirs. They
only Class I heir. Upon the death of
defendant no.1, the properties would devolve upon plaintiffs nos. 1 and
2 and defendant no. 2 ... clause (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 15 read with
Section 16 and the entry IV(1) of Class II of the Schedule
defendants that the area of 2 anas 4 paise share in Gat no.
70A was given to defendant no. 2 by consent of the parties ... Thus, plaintiff no. 1,
deceased Nana, plaintiff no. 2 and defendant no.1 are Class I
heirs of Waman who would get one-fourth share
