added as parties to that suit to prevent the collusive decree being was passed dismissed by the trial Court and was confirmed in revision, with ... averment in the plaint that the decree is a collusive decree, and since Section 17(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 does not cover
decree could not have been passed. Grant of such judgment
RSA No. 3100 of 2009 (6)
and decree is suggestive of the collusion between ... dishonest purpose. In these two cases this
Court set aside the collusive decree obtained by the
parties. Collusion, thus, is a foundation to put forward
obtained on 22.11.2004, which itself would show that it was a collusive decree. When the plaintiffs are not made parties and when they are directly ... adversely affected by such ex parte collusive decree, they had no other go except to file the suit to declare the offending Judgment as null
that is prohibited by law. To understand the nature of a collusive
decree/order better, it is necessary to survey the case ... dishonest purpose. In these two cases this Court set aside the
collusive decree obtained by the parties. Collusion, thus, is a
foundation to put forward
that is prohibited by law. To understand the nature of a collusive
decree/order better, it is necessary to survey the case ... dishonest purpose. In these two cases this Court set aside the
collusive decree obtained by the parties. Collusion, thus, is a
foundation to put forward
same is pending. Basing on the
collusive decree, the petitioners filed E.P.No.4 of 2017 before the XII
Additional District and Sessions Judge ... deceased filed the
complaint for criminal conspiracy in obtaining the collusive decree by
misrepresenting the factual aspects before the Court, criminal breach of
trust
respondent-
defendant No.1-Har Narain sought execution of the said collusive decree in
March 1982 and claimed for delivery of physical possession ... lease agreement as well as the decree;
g) The compromise based decree is collusive and fraudulent and is hence
not binding on the rights
both
Defenda nt s in the aforesaid Suits) is a collusive decree. He
has contended that the Builder could not obtain possession of
the suit ... collusive and fraud ulent
proceedings. It considered a fraud ulent proceeding distinct
from a collusive proceeding. The Court observed thus:-
"Collusion in judicial proceedi
transferred 33 kanals 6 marlas of the suit land vide a
collusive decree dated 13.11.1981 in favour of defendant No.2. It was
further averred ... consent decree. It is argued that a perusal of the decree (Ex.P-5)
would show that the same is collusive, inasmuch as, there
Court. By suppressing facts
and without impleading the necessary parties, a collusive
decree is obtained. In the case on hand, the collusion is
apparent ... unjust to accept the contention
of the respondents. Such a collusive decree also cannot
be allowed to stand. After coming to know of these facts