decree in favour
of his wife – original plaintiff in the present case. Consequently, a
decree of declaration was passed on 01.02.1995. The said decree ... original plaintiff filed the aforesaid collusive
suit being Civil Suit No.1643 of 1994 and obtained the collusive decree
dated 01.02.1995.
Thereafter, on the strength
remained in possession of the defendants No. 2 & 3. The
collusive decree dated 02.06.1994 was passed by the learned Trial
Court on the admission ... same ground, it cannot be held
that the decree was a collusive decree.
(Downloaded on 09/02/2022
remained in possession of the defendants No. 2 & 3. The
collusive decree dated 02.06.1994 was passed by the learned Trial
Court on the admission ... same ground, it cannot be held
that the decree was a collusive decree.
(Downloaded on 09/02/2022
remained in possession of the defendants No. 2 & 3. The
collusive decree dated 02.06.1994 was passed by the learned Trial
Court on the admission ... same ground, it cannot be held
that the decree was a collusive decree.
(Downloaded on 09/02/2022
addicted to vices and therefore,
defendant No.1 has entered into collusive decree in
O.S.No.12/1988, which was passed on 31.01.1981
thereby ... that the decree passed in O.S.No.12/1988 is
collusive decree.
3. Per contra, the original defendant No.1, on
receipt of summons
that is prohibited by law. To understand the nature of a collusive
decree/order better, it is necessary to survey the case ... dishonest purpose. In these two cases this Court set aside the
collusive decree obtained by the parties. Collusion, thus, is a
foundation to put forward
that is prohibited by law. To understand the nature of a collusive
decree/order better, it is necessary to survey the case ... dishonest purpose. In these two cases this Court set aside the
collusive decree obtained by the parties. Collusion, thus, is a
foundation to put forward
Adalat, therefore, the Lok Adalat decree is maintainable. It is not collusive decree
as contended by the Petitioner, at the same time, it was referred ... Court. By suppressing facts and without
impleading the necessary parties, a collusive decree is
obtained. In the case on hand, the collusion is apparent
Singh versus Wazir Singh, the
defendants have managed to procure a collusive decree at his back
and even sought its setting aside.
The claim ... this suit
property and second the setting aside of so called collusive decree
dated 04.05.1982 passed in a civil suit No.43 of 1982 titled
said decree is not binding on their right being a collusive decree and
defendant No.8 Raj Pal (appellant herein) has no right ... that the decree passed in favour of defendant No.8 was
collusive decree or that principle of lis pendens would apply. Learned senior
counsel
