circumstances, the court permitted 10%
deduction towards the development of the common facilities.
In Chakas_ vs. State of Punjab , (2011) 12 SCC 128, the
Supreme ... Court allowed 10% cut to be applied for common facilities as a
considerably big chunk of undeveloped parcel of the acquired land was
allotted
utilization of the land for roads, drains, parks and other common
facilities as well as the development cost. The Reference Court has relied
upon ... those circumstances, the court permitted 10% deduction
towards the development of common facilities.
7.6 In Chakas vs. State of Punjab
those circumstances, the court permitted 10% deduction
towards the development of common facilities.
7.6 In Chakas_ vs. State of Punjab ... Supreme Court allowed 10% cut to be applied for common facilities as a
considerably big chunk of undeveloped parcel of the acquired land was
allotted
area required for
carving out roads, streets, parks and other common facilities. This
aspect has been examined by this Court in detail in Jai Singh ... some part of the acquired land is
being used for providing common facilities. The
landowner does not gain anything exclusively on
account of reservation
some part of the acquired land is being used for
providing common facilities. The landowner does not gain
anything exclusively on account of reservation ... land for
common facilities. In fact, the landowner suffers a dual loss.
On the one hand, he is deprived of the acquired land
some
part of the acquired land is being used for providing
common facilities. The landowner does not gain anything
exclusively on account of reservation ... land for common
facilities. In fact, the landowner suffers a dual loss. On
the one hand, he is deprived of the acquired land
some part of
the acquired land is being used for providing common
facilities. The landowner does not gain anything exclusively
on account of reservation ... land for common facilities. In
fact, the landowner suffers a dual loss. On the one hand, he
is deprived of the acquired land
some part of the acquired
land is being used for providing common facilities. The landowner does not
gain anything exclusively on account of reservation ... land for common
facilities. In fact, the landowner suffers a dual loss. On the one hand, he is
deprived of the acquired land
some part of the acquired land is being used for
providing common facilities. The landowner does not gain
anything exclusively on account of reservation ... land for
common facilities. In fact, the landowner suffers a dual loss.
On the one hand, he is deprived of the acquired land
part of an integrated
colony being contiguous to each other, having common facilities with a
single entry and exit gate. Even the developers are common ... without any bifurcation or independent
identification and all the projects have common facilities including a single
entry and exit gate, then, the respondents are justified
