common wall. It is further
alleged that there is no objection from either side since 1974
which itself proves that the wall is common ... common
wall and no money was paid by the defendant for the
construction of the wall in question. PW1 further deposed that
the wall
rent to the defendant. It is accepted by him that common wall between
the area in possession of the plaintiff and the defendant ... adjoining houses is very common in Delhi.
It is also admitted by the plaintiff that the common wall is of 9 inches,
out of which
premises consisting of
one room (having two portions with common door separated by
a common wall, constructed to support the angle irons of roof ... installed a door in the
'roof angle iron supporting' common wall with the due prior
permission of the petitioners, and they
collusion with M/s Rajindra Xpress has removed part of common
wall in between the basements and a passage was constructed to join
the adjacent ... collusion with M/s
Rajinder Xpress removed part of the common wall in between the
basements and a passage was formed to join the adjacent
shops at the ground
floor in his portion after demolishing the common wall. The said illegal
demolition/ construction caused damage to property of the plaintiff ... cracks have developed in the property of plaintiff and if the
common wall is demolished, then the said property can easily fall down
which
that as per
the site plan the suit property has common entrance, common walls and
CS No. 608639/16 Hem Chand Jain vs Bimla Devi ... evidence on record to show that the suit property has common staircase,
common passage, common beam so as to give right of preemption
premises consisted of one room
(having two portions with common door separated by a
common wall, constructed to support the angle irons of roof ... petitioners to permit them to
install a door in the common wall of the room which the
petitioners permitted and accordingly the respondents installed
registered sale documents of
plaintiffs.
4. As per plaintiffs, common stone wall and common main gate
surrounding the plot of 2400 Sq Yards was constructed ... land alongwith the plaintiffs. It is denied
that there is any common stone wall or common main gate installed at
the said land of defendants
first floor
as shown in the site plan, breaking open the common wall on the
CS No.52347/16 Gurbinder Singh Anr Vs. Prem Singh ... person claiming through them from breaking open the common
wall on the upper floor of the house and creating any pathway of
entering the house
plaintiff's wall?OPP
4. Whether the plaintiff is exclusive owner of the disputed
wall/common wall of the property?OPP
5. Relief ... from the
wall/property of the plaintiff?OPP
4.Whether the plaintiff is exclusive owner of the disputed
wall/common wall of the property
