practice. Under similar circumstances, similar view had been taken by the National Commission in M/s. Pyramid Arcades Pvt. Ltd Vs. Raju Kishanchand Lakhani, First ... Case No.19/2010 , vide supplementary order dated 03.01.2013, the Competition Commission of India, held :-
"31.The terms of the agreement to be entered
practice. Under similar circumstances, similar view had been taken by the National Commission in M/s. Pyramid Arcades Pvt. Ltd Vs. Raju Kishanchand Lakhani, First ... Case No.19/2010 , vide supplementary order dated 03.01.2013, the Competition Commission of India, held :-
"31.The terms of the agreement to be entered
practice. Under similar circumstances, similar view has been taken by the National Commission in M/s. Pyramid Arcades Pvt. Ltd Vs. Raju Kishanchand Lakhani, First ... Case No.19/2010 , vide supplementary order dated 03.01.2013, the Competition Commission of India, held :-
"31.The terms of the agreement to be entered
remaining fees alongwith interest and compensation. The Hon'ble National Commission held in Paras 6 & 7 of its judgment as under ... stated here that that the Hon'ble National Commission in Sehgal School of Competition Vs. Dalbir Singh , 2009 (3) CPC 187, while dismissing
stated here that that the Hon'ble National Commission in Sehgal School of Competition Vs. Dalbir Singh , 2009 (3) CPC 187, while dismissing ... this order the respondent can approach this Commission."
The Hon'ble National Commission upheld the order qua refund of fee to the student
remaining fees alongwith interest and compensation. The Hon'ble National Commission held in Paras 6 & 7 of its judgment as under ... stated here that that the Hon'ble National Commission in Sehgal School of Competition Vs. Dalbir Singh , 2009 (3) CPC 187, while dismissing
February, 2019
Cause Title/Judgement-Entry STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION WEST BENGAL 11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087 First Appeal No. FA/559/2013 ... short, was that he applied for a competitive examination being conducted by the Staff Selection Commission. The concerned authority issued admit card and sent
State Commission UT Chandigarh."
15. However, reliance placed by the Counsel for the appellant/Opposite Party on the judgment of Competition Appellate Tribunal
opposite parties had violated the provisions of PAPR Act , as such, this Commission cannot go into the said question; that on request made ... different departments of the Govt. and also due to the business competition and political rivalries and this is why, the competent authorities have delayed
different departments of the Govt. and also due to the business competition and political rivalries and this is why, the competent authorities have delayed ... government. Remaining averments of the complaint have been denied.
This Commission has afforded adequate opportunities to both the parties to adduce evidence in support
