marks,
(ii) Senior mark must have reputation in India,
(iii) Junior mark for dis-similar goods/services,
(iv) The use of the junior mark ... nature. The mark of the plaintiff is a "label mark" and the mark of
the defendants, is a "word mark
applies to
both parties. While comparing marks, one should compare conflicting
composite marks by looking at them as a whole, rather than breaking the
marks ... Differencesv.Similarities
[1] The Anti-Dissection Rule
[a] Compare composites as a Whole Conflicting
composite marks are to be compared by looking at
them
user since 08.02.2011. Ex.P.20 Trade
Mark Certificate is a composite mark for the words “Dr Trust”
45 Similarly ... registration.
Therefore, a composite trademark can be said to be infringed, if any part
of such composite mark is either
(1) registered as a separate
user since 08.02.2011. Ex.P.20 Trade
Mark Certificate is a composite mark for the words “Dr Trust”
45 Similarly ... registration.
Therefore, a composite trademark can be said to be infringed, if any part
of such composite mark is either
(1) registered as a separate
respective wrappers of the plaintiff and the
defendant which were marked as Exhibit Nos.P14 and P21 are
reproduced below:-
Plaintiff's wrapper ... order to protect the composite label comprising the aforesaid
expression “Magic Masala”, the plaintiff claims to have filed several
trade marks applications under
M/S.Veppolodai Chemicals vs Ds Spiceco Private Limited on 9 June, 2023
Author: C
M/S.Veppolodai Chemicals vs Ds Spiceco Private Limited on 9 June, 2023
Author: C
M/S.Veppolodai Chemicals vs Ds Spiceco Private Limited on 9 June, 2023
Author: C
advertisement had appeared in the
Trade Marks Journal as regard application for registration of the trade
mark of the defendant therein, the Delhi High Court ... violation of the provisions of the Trade
Marks Act is only incidental, a composite suit will lie
or not, as such a question does
advertisement had appeared in the Trade
Marks Journal as regard application for registration of the trade mark of
the defendant therein, the Delhi High Court ... violation of the provisions of the Trade
Marks Act is only incidental, a composite suit will lie
or not, as such a question does
