serious plea
of enmity. There is no suggestion given to prosecutrix
regarding consensual relationship. The paternity of the child
was admitted after the report ... girl and the child, which as per him was a product of
consensual relationship though denied by the prosecutrix.
Defence of the accused
evil on each side. There is a clear distinction between
rape and consensual sex and in a case like this, the court must very
carefully ... disclose this
fact to anybody. Thereafter they both were engaged in consensual sex at
different places and in all these meeting the accused swore that
evil on each side. There is a clear
distinction between rape and consensual sex and in a
case like this, the court must very carefully ... disclose this fact to anybody.
Thereafter they both were engaged in consensual sex at different
places and in all these meeting the accused swore that
evil
on each side. There is a clear distinction between rape and consensual
sex and in a case like this, the court must very carefully ... disclose this fact to
anybody. Thereafter they both were engaged in consensual sex at different
Sessions Case Number : 92 of 2013.
Unique Case ID Number
evil on each side. There is a clear
distinction between rape and consensual sex and in a case
like this, the court must very carefully
evil on each
side. There is a clear distinction between rape and consensual sex and in a
case like this, the court must very carefully
State vs . Vijay Singh Bainsla Page No. 1/69 on 4 February, 2017
IN THE
prosecutrix were good friends and physical
relations between both of them were consensual. But with
passage of some time, the prosecutrix was attracted towards
somebody ... disputed. But A1 came forward with the plea that it was
consensual sexual relationship. Whether it was consensual
or not shall be looked into
daughter at any
point of time and she was having a consensual relationship with the
accused and she was aware of the same.
Medical Evidence ... further stated that prosecutrix 'R' had a consensual relationship
with him and now she had falsely implicated him. The accused
has examined five
sections 375 and 377 are not watertight
categories; the former criminalises nonconsensual maleonfemale sexual intercourse
and carnal intercourse ("sexual acts ... latter covers all remaining forms of non
consensual carnal intercourse. This is further accentuated by the decision of Apex
Court in Navtej Singh Johar
