Khushdil Roadways vs Amartex Industries Private Limited on 27 July, 2011
Fabric Material worth Rs.1,39,000/- to
Faridabad, as self consignee on GR No.351111 dated 19.5.2007. So, the
complainant hired the services
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 105 (0.07 seconds)M/S. Simex India Private Limited ... vs M/S. The New India Assurance Company ... on 4 April, 2012
Sreemathi CLR-131 vessel
and consignors were complainant and consignee were self and goods were to
be carried from Mundra to Mangalore port.
So from ... Simex Marketing Services Pvt.Ltd. of Mumbai
and consignee were self and goods were to be carried by sea in
M.S.V.Sreemathi
Amritsar Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd vs Shushil Kumar Gupta on 21 February, 2006
find that the name of the consignee has been mentioned as self. It is not understandable as to what made the
appellant deliver the consignment ... appellant to deliver the goods to them directly when
the consignee was self. Deficiency in
service in such like matters in terms of Section
P.P. Khurana vs Vishal Goods Carriers on 3 April, 2008
Jhalawar through the
OP-carrier. The consignee was
self. The consignments were to be
delivered to M/s J.K. Synthetics at Jhalawar after
retirement ... Contract Act as the complain ant has been
directly negotiating with the consignee for the recovery of the amount.
3. OP
has placed on record
M/S. Hirusah Cosmetics (P) Ltd.,85, Psk ... vs M/S. Kerala Roadways Ltd.,Rep. By Its ... on 6 June, 2011
take rebooked
consignment, owing to the dispute between consignor and consignee and the
consignee had written a letter to settle the dispute, thereby showing ... appears to be between the consignor and consignee though the
consignor described himself, as the consignee indicating Self. Because of this reason alone, as admitted
A. Viswanathan,Head Office, Door ... vs J. Thirumalai Rajan S/O.S.P. ... on 30 December, 2011
usual course, when the goods consigned are delivered to
the consignee, being Self it is the duty of the service provider, namely the
transport
State Bank Of India Erode (Code 0837) ... vs P.S. Duraisamy S/O. Senimalai Gounder ... on 29 September, 2011
Rajeswar Prasad Seth, Chanda, Harariya District,
Bihar, mentioning the consignee as self not mentioning the name of the
purchaser. The credit invoices and the
hundis ... consignee viz. the purchaser, though
credit invoices were raised, and way bills were prepared, indicating the
consignor, as the consignee i.e., self, giving without
M/S M.R.F Ltd vs M/S Lalji Mulji Transport Co.Ltd on 28 December, 2022
oral instruction of
consignor goods where delivered and consignee had taken delivery
and thereafter consignee copies are never produced at delivery
destination for delivery ... goods
sent in the name of 'self'?
Ans.: To delivery to goods to consignee who produced consignee. No
such consignee copies are produce
M/S Harmeet Toys Agency vs Decan Queen Transport Co. on 4 December, 2014
consignment was mentioned as self. OP thus misappropriated the goods and was
guilty of deficiency of service as defined under Section ... excessive. It was alleged that the word self read with
M/s Ganpati Agencies, Goa as consignee in tax invoice would mean that the
consignee
Thakkar Exim vs Tata Aig Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd on 29 March, 2023
from Kolkata India to Tamatave Port of
Madagascar. That the name of consignee was declared as ETS Mohammed Tamatave,
Madagascar and invoice value of goods ... opponent came out with self-suited exclusions to
repudiate legitimate claim. That the consignee had extended fullest co-operation in
investigation and assessment of claim