name of the petitioner as Consignor and "self" as consignee. The railways receipts are sent to the respective offices of the petitioner ... name of the petitioner as the consignor and "self" as consignee, and that the railway receipts were then sent to the petitioner
consignor and M/s Shree
Laxmi Fine Chemical, Baroda and self as consignee were
recovered but the search of the shop of Attar Singh ... those goods was also
Shree Laxmi Fine Chemical, Baroda and the consignee was
self but as per delivery note the consignee note, the
consignee
receipt No. 289352, invoice No. 46 dated June 21,1969. The consignee was self. Receipt was however endorsed with t
(2) The said Wagon
generated by Krishna Transport Company
(Titu) indicating the name of the consignee as self. The said document
refers to three Bgs of "EL Wire ... Duli Chand Om Prakash" and the
name of the consignee is referred to as "Garg Bartan Bhandar". The
said document also mentions
Court , wherein he stated that the consignee of the R/R in dispute was self which was nto endorsed in the name of the defendants
therefore, be accepted simply bacause a consignee in a railway receipt is different from a consignor that the consignee must be held ... passed that the consignee may be able to sue. Whether title to goods has passed from the consignor to the consignee will depend upon
manufacturer's factory premises before its
dispatch/delivery to the consignee. 95% payment was to be released
against proof of inspection and dispatch. Balance ... booked in the name of 'self' by the contractor instead of
booking the same in the consignee's name. The second grievance
goods receipt No. 29403. In the receipt the consignee was shown as "self".
(3) The delivery was to be taken by Messrs Beauty
branded self-drilling screws
within the state of Maharashtra dating back to 2010, and commercial
import invoices, reflecting LF as the consignee, dating back
consignee is none other than the
appellant/defendant and in the bill of lading Ex.PW1/4 the consignee
is written as Sh. Virendar ... making self-serving
averments, no credible evidence has been led to disbelieve the natural
course of events, that it is only the consignee who would
