Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1374 (2.19 seconds)

Deputy vs Jagrut on 13 May, 2010

service. It is, therefore, clear that Consumer Courts established under Consumer Protection Act can entertain and decide the dispute between the parties relating to deficiency ... Electricity Act, 2003 the Consumer can file the complaint before the Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum constituted under the Act and against the decision of Forum
Gujarat High Court Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - K A Puj - Full Document

Sub vs Ansuyaben on 23 September, 2010

call for the records and pass appropriate orders in any consumer dispute which is pending before or has been decided by any State Commission where ... consumer disputes and adjudication thereof. The 1986 Act is a complete Code unto itself. It defines the various terms like `consumer', `consumer dispute
Gujarat High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - H K Rathod - Full Document

Thakkar Vasudev Kanaiyalal vs President Consumer Dispute Redressal ... on 10 March, 2023

Thakkar Vasudev Kanaiyalal vs President Consumer Dispute Redressal ... on 10 March, 2023 Author: N.V.Anjaria Bench: N.V.Anjaria C/MCA/1196/2022 ORDER ... CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8579 of 2022 ========================================================== THAKKAR VASUDEV KANAIYALAL Versus PRESIDENT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION MAIN SHRI NAKAHT PRAVEEN SYED & 1 other(s) ========================================================== Appearance
Gujarat High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - N V Anjaria - Full Document

Nimeshkumar S. Chawda vs Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum ... on 2 February, 2026

Nimeshkumar S. Chawda vs Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum ... on 2 February, 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/212/2026 ORDER DATED: 02/02/2026 undefined ... SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 212 of 2026 ========================================================== NIMESHKUMAR S. CHAWDA Versus CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM SURAT(MAIN) ========================================================== Appearance: MR RONIT V RATHOD
Gujarat High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dakshin vs Sitponwala on 8 April, 2010

petitioner licensee company is aggrieved by the orders passed by Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum (District Forum, for short) or the State Commission constituted under ... consumer are not maintainable before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum. 42. For the reasons aforesaid, we hold that the Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission have erred
Gujarat High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - K M Thaker - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next