Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 98 (0.73 seconds)

Jugraj Arora vs S. Lakshminarayanan on 17 May, 2000

Contempt of Courts (C.A.T.), Rules, 1992, provide the manner of taking cognizance of the contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act , after institution ... Tribunal has already taken cognizance of the contempt of this Tribunal under the Contempt of Courts Act . In the instant case, vide, order dated
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jodhpur Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shanta Bai vs M/O Railways on 10 April, 2026

barred by law of limitation prescribed under Section 20 of Contempt of Courts Act. 1.3 Before filing a reply to the CP, the petitioner ... exercise of powers conferred by Section 23 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, read with Section 17 of the Administrative Tribunals Act
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jodhpur Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt Shanta Bai vs M/O Railways on 10 April, 2026

objection raised by the respondents, provisions of Section 20 of Contempt of Courts Act prescribe limitation period of one year from the date of contempt ... exercise of powers conferred by Section 23 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, read with Section 17 of the Administrative Tribunals Act
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jodhpur Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Kumar vs Girish Pillai on 31 July, 2019

these Contempt Petitions have been filed on 3.8.2017 and 18.8.2017 whereas the limitation for filing Contempt Petition under the Contempt of Courts Act ... Petition, without having initiated contempt proceedings for non-compliance. There is no provision under the said Contempt of Courts Act to condone the delay
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jodhpur Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yogesh Vyas vs Rajesh Tiwari on 31 July, 2019

these Contempt Petitions have been filed on 3.8.2017 and 18.8.2017 whereas the limitation for filing Contempt Petition under the Contempt of Courts Act ... Petition, without having initiated contempt proceedings for non-compliance. There is no provision under the said Contempt of Courts Act to condone the delay
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jodhpur Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Brijlata vs B R Suthar on 28 August, 2019

Nigam, Member (A) This Contempt Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 17 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 against the respondents ... act of the respondents, they should be punished under the Contempt of Court Act . In this regard, he also relied upon the following judgments
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jodhpur Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next