directed by this Court. Therefore, the Corporation had to face contempt
proceedings in Contempt Petition No.1391 of 2015, which was closed after
recording ... made by the petitioner and other encroachers,
the Corporation faced another contempt proceedings in Contempt Petition
No.13 of 2016. In that matter, the Corporation
directed by this Court. Therefore, the Corporation had to face contempt
proceedings in Contempt Petition No.1391 of 2015, which was closed after
recording ... made by the petitioner and other
encroachers, the Corporation faced another contempt proceedings in
Contempt Petition No.13 of 2016. In that matter, the Corporation
directed by this Court. Therefore, the Corporation had to face contempt
proceedings in Contempt Petition No.1391 of 2015, which was closed after
recording ... made by the petitioner and other encroachers,
the Corporation faced another contempt proceedings in Contempt Petition
No.13 of 2016. In that matter, the Corporation
directed by this Court. Therefore, the Corporation had to face contempt
proceedings in Contempt Petition No.1391 of 2015, which was closed after
recording ... made by the petitioner and other encroachers,
the Corporation faced another contempt proceedings in Contempt Petition
No.13 of 2016. In that matter, the Corporation
question is
whether seniority list is open to review in the contempt
proceedings to find out whether it is in conformity with the
___________
Page ... violation of the order. After re-
exercising the judicial review in contempt proceedings, a fresh
direction by the learned Single Judge cannot be given
question is whether seniority list is open to
review in the contempt proceedings to find out
whether it is in conformity with the directions
issued ... violation of
the order. After re-exercising the judicial review
in contempt proceedings, a fresh direction by the
learned Single Judge cannot be given
authorities. It is a case where till the initiation of
the contempt proceedings the respondent
authorities acted in cahoots with the encroachers,
rather than taking
guidelines given in the earlier
order dated 18.01.2010. Contempt proceedings were
initiated for non-implementation of the directions of this
Court in the orders dated ... opportunity to enable each
defaulting State to explain as to why contempt action
should not be taken.
16. By order dated 07.02.2012, taking note
motu contempt against the
respondents, who were not complying with the orders in different ways, and
proceeded in accordance with due process ... only two options available to this Bench. First, to initiate
contempt proceedings against the respondents. If a contempt action is invoked, it
would only result
Contemnor/3rd party
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act, to initiate contempt proceedings against the Contemnor and
punish ... ContP.(MD)No.408 of 2023
ORDER
This Contempt Petition has been filed to initiate contempt
proceedings against the contemnor/respondent for his willful disobedience
