subject matter in issue was not a fit case for initiating contempt proceedings and the 1st Respondent/Petitioner was informed about this by the Registrar ... matrix, opined that this was not a fit case to initiate contempt proceedings against the Respondents.
23.Thereafter, the Registry put up an Office Note
Thereafter, the said action sale was cancelled due to the contempt proceedings.
15.The 3rd Respondent initiated contempt proceedings in Contempt Petition ... interim injunction (in W.P.No.24656/2002) and the contempt proceedings were closed, as unnecessary, by the Court on 29.10.2004, for the reason that
Madurai Bench of this Court in
regard to the contempt proceedings filed by one Meenakshi, against his
predecessor viz., Selvakumar and others. After knowing ... contempt
proceedings and the Writ Petition filed by the said Meenakshi, he verified
the entire files available in his office in connection with said matter
before the Court inspite of summons issued by the learned Magistrate, contempt proceedings will be initiated by this Court.
8.The writ petition is allowed
contempt petition was filed by the petitioner for not complying with the order passed by this Court dated 12.04.1996. In the contempt petition, after considering ... Therefore, the order passed by the learned single Judge in the contempt proceedings is beyond the scope of the contempt proceedings. Therefore, on the basis
learned counsel for the petitioner that the order passed in matrimonial proceedings are interlocutory orders and not the final orders and even in compromise orders ... petitioner/husband is concerned, he is not interested in initiating the contempt proceedings against the respondent/wife and as per Section 6 of the Hindu
Dr.V.Sridevi vs Dr.C.S.Mani on 29 April, 2019
Bench: S.Manikumar
before Family Court, Coimbatore to initiate contempt proceedings against the Respondent for violating the orders of the Court ... Appellant had filed I.A.No.636 of 2009 to initiate contempt proceedings against the Respondent for violating the orders of the Court
confer its blessings. It does not matter that to the contempt proceedings Somani Builders was not a party. It cannot gain an advantage in derogation ... appear either to oppose the O.A. or during the proceedings, initiated by petitioners herein. Their silence on the material aspect of violation of injunction
demanding higher stamp duty was held to be reprehensible and the contempt proceedings was not initiated and cost not awarded in the light of fair
