Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 524 (0.03 seconds)

*1. M.V. Varghese vs Vijayakumar P

past litigation. 2. When a dispute arose between Petty Contract Workers and Contract Line Workers on one side and the Kerala State Electricity Board ... other side in respect of regularisation of service of Petty Contract Workers and Contract Line Workers, Government as per G.O.(Rt) No.2929/2002

Manoj V.V vs The Executive Engineer

MANOJ V.V., AGED 47 YEARS S/O.VELAYUDHAN PETTY CONTRACT WORKER IN KANDASANKADAVU SECTION KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VAKKAT HOUSE, ELTHURUTHU PO, THRISSUR ... ANIL KUMAR @ ABI AGED 53, S/O.ARJUNAN PETTY CONTRACT WORKER IN KANDASANKADAVU SECTION KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, KOOTALA HOUSE KANDASANKADAVU PO, THRISSURE. 3. RAJEEVAN
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - K V Chandran - Full Document

Hindustan Colas Ltd , Mum vs Assessee

above proposition. As regards, the number of workers, it was also pointed out that casual workers and contract workers were required to be taken into ... Works Private Limited (339 ITR 491). Taking into account the casual/contract workers, the assessee did fulfill the condition of requisite number of workers being
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Superintending Engineer vs M. Murugan

various works of the Board and they were treated as contract workers for the purpose of denying the regular benefits. They were orally terminated from ... reiterated that, at the time of absorption and regularisation, the contract workers shall be in employment and this absorption and regularisation shall be done only

The Superintending Engineer vs M. Murugan

various works of the Board and they were treated as contract workers for the purpose of denying the regular benefits. They were orally terminated from ... reiterated that, at the time of absorption and regularisation, the contract workers shall be in employment and this absorption and regularisation shall be done only
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next