contract labour is not permissible in view of the abolition of contract labour by a notification under Section 10 of the Act, such contract workers ... license under Section 12 of the Act and still contract labour is engaged such contract workers would be treated as direct employees of the principal
ultimately it is found that contract labour in respect of jobs/work/process undertaken by these contract workers in respect of the offices/establishments where ... contract workers.
2. In case of contract with a particular contractor who has engaged these petitioners/contract workers, comes to an end the said contract
contract labour in this field, act does not make any distinction between ex-servicemen and non-ex-servicemen and all such contract workers ... industry. For such functions, contract labour was permissible under the Act and legislature never intended to abolish contract workers in such fields. He also referred
petitioners are not the direct employees of AAI and they are contract workers who were engaged by M/s. EATS Ltd. to whom contract ... notification under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation &
Abolition) Act.
6. In case the contract workers claim that a particular contract
Sonipat. The appellant stated that the
respondent may have worked as a contract employee with the said contractor
and deployed at the establishment ... carrying out the petty jobs, who in turn had engaged contract workers. The
respondent was not issued any appointment/engagement letter by the
appellant
entitled to regularisation. It is stated that they were employed as contract workers through M/s. Everest Enterprises/respondent No. 3 which was not permissible
date of notifying the educational institutions under the
Act.
(iv) Contract workers should be brought under the purview of
the Act by laying down specific
claim to be its members. Petitioners 2 to 23 are contract workers engaged by respondent No.3, contractor. Their principle employer is respondent ... Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act. Respondent No.2 is not registered under Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act . Respondent No.3 was not licensed
revised wages is to be made by the appellant to
all contract workers engaged in the mining activities. It originated
under the circumstances mentioned hereinafter ... Compensation Formula in the contract awarded to the
appellant. The appellant started paying the revised wages to the
contract workers as per the directions
Haryana holding similar posts. Daily-rated workers are not required to possess the qualifications prescribed for regular workers, nor do they have to fulfill ... doubt the petitioners here are not daily wage workers but appointed on contract basis. The aforesaid principles laid down by Supreme Court apply in their
