Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 222 (1.02 seconds)

The Superintending Engineer vs M. Murugan

various works of the Board and they were treated as contract workers for the purpose of denying the regular benefits. They were orally terminated from ... reiterated that, at the time of absorption and regularisation, the contract workers shall be in employment and this absorption and regularisation shall be done only

The Superintending Engineer vs M. Murugan

various works of the Board and they were treated as contract workers for the purpose of denying the regular benefits. They were orally terminated from ... reiterated that, at the time of absorption and regularisation, the contract workers shall be in employment and this absorption and regularisation shall be done only

S.Thiruarasu vs Nlc India Ltd

Labour and Staff Union, which is espousing the cause of the workers working in the first respondent Corporation without any compromise. The petitioner actively involved ... respondent. The Union is also insisting to regularise the contract workers and to provide job to those, whose lands have 3/53 http://www.judis
Madras High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - M Dhandapani - Full Document

The Chairperson vs V.Manoharan

Wilson, learned Senior Counsel, is that after termination of the contract with the spillage workers association on 06.12.2012, the utilisation of the services ... need for the Port Trust to engage the services of the contract workers. Therefore, there was no obligation on the part of the Port Trust

The Superintending Engineer vs T.Babu

being whether the contract system adopted by the Electricity Board was genuine and whether the classification of the workmen as contract workers, as claimed ... from the evidence of the Management Witnesses that for absorbing the contract workers as per the scheme framed by Justice Khalid Commission, the similar certificates
Madras High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next